Hot-keys on this page
r m x p toggle line displays
j k next/prev highlighted chunk
0 (zero) top of page
1 (one) first highlighted chunk
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*- """ Miscellaneous `p`-adic functions
`p`-adic functions from ell_rational_field.py, moved here to reduce crowding in that file. """
###################################################################### # Copyright (C) 2007 William Stein <wstein@gmail.com> # # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) # # This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU # General Public License for more details. # # The full text of the GPL is available at: # # http://www.gnu.org/licenses/ ###################################################################### from __future__ import absolute_import
import sage.rings.all as rings from . import padic_lseries as plseries import sage.arith.all as arith from sage.rings.all import ( Qp, Zp, Integers, Integer, O, PowerSeriesRing, LaurentSeriesRing, RationalField) import math import sage.misc.misc as misc import sage.matrix.all as matrix sqrt = math.sqrt import sage.schemes.hyperelliptic_curves.monsky_washnitzer import sage.schemes.hyperelliptic_curves.hypellfrob from sage.misc.all import cached_method
def __check_padic_hypotheses(self, p): r""" Helper function that determines if `p` is an odd prime of good ordinary reduction.
EXAMPLES::
sage: E = EllipticCurve('11a1') sage: from sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.padics import __check_padic_hypotheses sage: __check_padic_hypotheses(E,5) 5 sage: __check_padic_hypotheses(E,29) Traceback (most recent call last): ... ArithmeticError: p must be a good ordinary prime
""" raise ValueError("p = (%s) must be prime"%p) raise ValueError("p must be odd")
def _normalize_padic_lseries(self, p, normalize, use_eclib, implementation, precision): r""" Normalize parameters for :meth:`padic_lseries`.
TESTS::
sage: from sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.padics import _normalize_padic_lseries sage: u = _normalize_padic_lseries(None, 5, None, None, 'sage', 10) sage: v = _normalize_padic_lseries(None, 5, "L_ratio", None, 'sage', 10) sage: u == v True """ from sage.misc.superseded import deprecation deprecation(812,"Use the option 'implementation' instead of 'use_eclib'") if implementation == 'pollackstevens': raise ValueError if use_eclib: implementation = 'eclib' else: implementation = 'sage' raise ValueError("Must specify precision when using 'pollackstevens'") raise ValueError("The 'normalize' parameter is not used for Pollack-Stevens' overconvergent modular symbols") else: raise ValueError("Implementation should be one of 'sage', 'eclib' or 'pollackstevens'") #if precision is not None and implementation != 'pollackstevens': # raise ValueError("Must *not* specify precision unless using 'pollackstevens'")
@cached_method(key=_normalize_padic_lseries) def padic_lseries(self, p, normalize = None, use_eclib = None, implementation = 'eclib', precision = None): r""" Return the `p`-adic `L`-series of self at `p`, which is an object whose approx method computes approximation to the true `p`-adic `L`-series to any desired precision.
INPUT:
- ``p`` - prime
- ``normalize`` - 'L_ratio' (default), 'period' or 'none'; this is describes the way the modular symbols are normalized. See modular_symbol for more details.
- ``use_eclib`` - deprecated, use ``implementation`` instead
- ``implementation`` - 'eclib' (default), 'sage', 'pollackstevens'; Whether to use John Cremona's eclib, the Sage implementation, or Pollack-Stevens' implementation of overconvergent modular symbols.
EXAMPLES::
sage: E = EllipticCurve('37a') sage: L = E.padic_lseries(5); L 5-adic L-series of Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 + y = x^3 - x over Rational Field sage: type(L) <class 'sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.padic_lseries.pAdicLseriesOrdinary'>
We compute the `3`-adic `L`-series of two curves of rank `0` and in each case verify the interpolation property for their leading coefficient (i.e., value at 0)::
sage: e = EllipticCurve('11a') sage: ms = e.modular_symbol() sage: [ms(1/11), ms(1/3), ms(0), ms(oo)] [0, -3/10, 1/5, 0] sage: ms(0) 1/5 sage: L = e.padic_lseries(3) sage: P = L.series(5) sage: P(0) 2 + 3 + 3^2 + 2*3^3 + 2*3^5 + 3^6 + O(3^7) sage: alpha = L.alpha(9); alpha 2 + 3^2 + 2*3^3 + 2*3^4 + 2*3^6 + 3^8 + O(3^9) sage: R.<x> = QQ[] sage: f = x^2 - e.ap(3)*x + 3 sage: f(alpha) O(3^9) sage: r = e.lseries().L_ratio(); r 1/5 sage: (1 - alpha^(-1))^2 * r 2 + 3 + 3^2 + 2*3^3 + 2*3^5 + 3^6 + 3^7 + O(3^9) sage: P(0) 2 + 3 + 3^2 + 2*3^3 + 2*3^5 + 3^6 + O(3^7)
Next consider the curve 37b::
sage: e = EllipticCurve('37b') sage: L = e.padic_lseries(3) sage: P = L.series(5) sage: alpha = L.alpha(9); alpha 1 + 2*3 + 3^2 + 2*3^5 + 2*3^7 + 3^8 + O(3^9) sage: r = e.lseries().L_ratio(); r 1/3 sage: (1 - alpha^(-1))^2 * r 3 + 3^2 + 2*3^4 + 2*3^5 + 2*3^6 + 3^7 + O(3^9) sage: P(0) 3 + 3^2 + 2*3^4 + 2*3^5 + O(3^6)
We can use Sage modular symbols instead to compute the `L`-series::
sage: e = EllipticCurve('11a') sage: L = e.padic_lseries(3, implementation = 'sage') sage: L.series(5,prec=10) 2 + 3 + 3^2 + 2*3^3 + 2*3^5 + 3^6 + O(3^7) + (1 + 3 + 2*3^2 + 3^3 + O(3^4))*T + (1 + 2*3 + O(3^4))*T^2 + (3 + 2*3^2 + O(3^3))*T^3 + (2*3 + 3^2 + O(3^3))*T^4 + (2 + 2*3 + 2*3^2 + O(3^3))*T^5 + (1 + 3^2 + O(3^3))*T^6 + (2 + 3^2 + O(3^3))*T^7 + (2 + 2*3 + 2*3^2 + O(3^3))*T^8 + (2 + O(3^2))*T^9 + O(T^10)
Finally, we can use the overconvergent method of Pollack-Stevens.::
sage: e = EllipticCurve('11a') sage: L = e.padic_lseries(3, implementation = 'pollackstevens', precision = 6) sage: L.series(5) 2 + 3 + 3^2 + 2*3^3 + 2*3^5 + O(3^6) + (1 + 3 + 2*3^2 + 3^3 + O(3^4))*T + (1 + 2*3 + O(3^2))*T^2 + (3 + O(3^2))*T^3 + O(3^0)*T^4 + O(T^5) sage: L[3] 3 + O(3^2)
Another example with a semistable prime.::
sage: E = EllipticCurve("11a1") sage: L = E.padic_lseries(11, implementation = 'pollackstevens', precision=3) sage: L[1] 10 + 3*11 + O(11^2) sage: L[3] O(11^0) """ normalize, use_eclib, implementation, precision)
normalize = normalize, implementation = implementation) else: normalize = normalize, implementation = implementation) else: else:
def padic_regulator(self, p, prec=20, height=None, check_hypotheses=True): r""" Computes the cyclotomic `p`-adic regulator of this curve.
INPUT:
- ``p`` - prime = 5
- ``prec`` - answer will be returned modulo `p^{\mathrm{prec}}`
- ``height`` - precomputed height function. If not supplied, this function will call padic_height to compute it.
- ``check_hypotheses`` - boolean, whether to check that this is a curve for which the p-adic height makes sense
OUTPUT: The p-adic cyclotomic regulator of this curve, to the requested precision.
If the rank is 0, we output 1.
.. TODO::
Remove restriction that curve must be in minimal Weierstrass form. This is currently required for E.gens().
AUTHORS:
- Liang Xiao: original implementation at the 2006 MSRI graduate workshop on modular forms
- David Harvey (2006-09-13): cleaned up and integrated into Sage, removed some redundant height computations
- Chris Wuthrich (2007-05-22): added multiplicative and supersingular cases
- David Harvey (2007-09-20): fixed some precision loss that was occurring
EXAMPLES::
sage: E = EllipticCurve("37a") sage: E.padic_regulator(5, 10) 5 + 5^2 + 5^3 + 3*5^6 + 4*5^7 + 5^9 + O(5^10)
An anomalous case::
sage: E.padic_regulator(53, 10) 26*53^-1 + 30 + 20*53 + 47*53^2 + 10*53^3 + 32*53^4 + 9*53^5 + 22*53^6 + 35*53^7 + 30*53^8 + O(53^9)
An anomalous case where the precision drops some::
sage: E = EllipticCurve("5077a") sage: E.padic_regulator(5, 10) 5 + 5^2 + 4*5^3 + 2*5^4 + 2*5^5 + 2*5^6 + 4*5^7 + 2*5^8 + 5^9 + O(5^10)
Check that answers agree over a range of precisions::
sage: max_prec = 30 # make sure we get past p^2 # long time sage: full = E.padic_regulator(5, max_prec) # long time sage: for prec in range(1, max_prec): # long time ....: assert E.padic_regulator(5, prec) == full # long time
A case where the generator belongs to the formal group already (:trac:`3632`)::
sage: E = EllipticCurve([37,0]) sage: E.padic_regulator(5,10) 2*5^2 + 2*5^3 + 5^4 + 5^5 + 4*5^6 + 3*5^8 + 4*5^9 + O(5^10)
The result is not dependent on the model for the curve::
sage: E = EllipticCurve([0,0,0,0,2^12*17]) sage: Em = E.minimal_model() sage: E.padic_regulator(7) == Em.padic_regulator(7) True
Allow a Python int as input::
sage: E = EllipticCurve('37a') sage: E.padic_regulator(int(5)) 5 + 5^2 + 5^3 + 3*5^6 + 4*5^7 + 5^9 + 5^10 + 3*5^11 + 3*5^12 + 5^13 + 4*5^14 + 5^15 + 2*5^16 + 5^17 + 2*5^18 + 4*5^19 + O(5^20) """ raise ValueError("p = (%s) must be prime"%p) raise ValueError("p must be odd") # todo raise ArithmeticError("p must be a semi-stable prime")
else: return Qp(p,prec)(1)
def padic_height_pairing_matrix(self, p, prec=20, height=None, check_hypotheses=True): r""" Computes the cyclotomic `p`-adic height pairing matrix of this curve with respect to the basis self.gens() for the Mordell-Weil group for a given odd prime p of good ordinary reduction.
INPUT:
- ``p`` - prime = 5
- ``prec`` - answer will be returned modulo `p^{\mathrm{prec}}`
- ``height`` - precomputed height function. If not supplied, this function will call padic_height to compute it.
- ``check_hypotheses`` - boolean, whether to check that this is a curve for which the p-adic height makes sense
OUTPUT: The p-adic cyclotomic height pairing matrix of this curve to the given precision.
.. TODO::
remove restriction that curve must be in minimal Weierstrass form. This is currently required for E.gens().
AUTHORS:
- David Harvey, Liang Xiao, Robert Bradshaw, Jennifer Balakrishnan: original implementation at the 2006 MSRI graduate workshop on modular forms
- David Harvey (2006-09-13): cleaned up and integrated into Sage, removed some redundant height computations
EXAMPLES::
sage: E = EllipticCurve("37a") sage: E.padic_height_pairing_matrix(5, 10) [5 + 5^2 + 5^3 + 3*5^6 + 4*5^7 + 5^9 + O(5^10)]
A rank two example::
sage: e =EllipticCurve('389a') sage: e._set_gens([e(-1, 1), e(1,0)]) # avoid platform dependent gens sage: e.padic_height_pairing_matrix(5,10) [ 3*5 + 2*5^2 + 5^4 + 5^5 + 5^7 + 4*5^9 + O(5^10) 5 + 4*5^2 + 5^3 + 2*5^4 + 3*5^5 + 4*5^6 + 5^7 + 5^8 + 2*5^9 + O(5^10)] [5 + 4*5^2 + 5^3 + 2*5^4 + 3*5^5 + 4*5^6 + 5^7 + 5^8 + 2*5^9 + O(5^10) 4*5 + 2*5^4 + 3*5^6 + 4*5^7 + 4*5^8 + O(5^10)]
An anomalous rank 3 example::
sage: e = EllipticCurve("5077a") sage: e._set_gens([e(-1,3), e(2,0), e(4,6)]) sage: e.padic_height_pairing_matrix(5,4) [4 + 3*5 + 4*5^2 + 4*5^3 + O(5^4) 4 + 4*5^2 + 2*5^3 + O(5^4) 3*5 + 4*5^2 + 5^3 + O(5^4)] [ 4 + 4*5^2 + 2*5^3 + O(5^4) 3 + 4*5 + 3*5^2 + 5^3 + O(5^4) 2 + 4*5 + O(5^4)] [ 3*5 + 4*5^2 + 5^3 + O(5^4) 2 + 4*5 + O(5^4) 1 + 3*5 + 5^2 + 5^3 + O(5^4)]
"""
return M
# Use <P, Q> =1/2*( h(P + Q) - h(P) - h(Q) )
def _multiply_point(E, R, P, m): r""" Computes coordinates of a multiple of P with entries in a ring.
INPUT:
- ``E`` - elliptic curve over Q with integer coefficients
- ``P`` - a rational point on P that reduces to a non-singular point at all primes
- ``R`` - a ring in which 2 is invertible (typically `\ZZ/L\ZZ` for some positive odd integer `L`).
- ``m`` - an integer, = 1
OUTPUT: A triple `(a', b', d')` such that if the point `mP` has coordinates `(a/d^2, b/d^3)`, then we have `a' \equiv a`, `b' \equiv \pm b`, `d' \equiv \pm d` all in `R` (i.e. modulo `L`).
Note the ambiguity of signs for `b'` and `d'`. There's not much one can do about this, but at least one can say that the sign for `b'` will match the sign for `d'`.
ALGORITHM: Proposition 9 of "Efficient Computation of p-adic Heights" (David Harvey, to appear in LMS JCM).
Complexity is soft-`O(\log L \log m + \log^2 m)`.
AUTHORS:
- David Harvey (2008-01): replaced _DivPolyContext with _multiply_point
EXAMPLES:
37a has trivial Tamagawa numbers so all points have nonsingular reduction at all primes::
sage: E = EllipticCurve("37a") sage: P = E([0, -1]); P (0 : -1 : 1) sage: 19*P (-59997896/67387681 : 88075171080/553185473329 : 1) sage: R = Integers(625) sage: from sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.padics import _multiply_point sage: _multiply_point(E, R, P, 19) (229, 170, 541) sage: -59997896 % 625 229 sage: -88075171080 % 625 # note sign is flipped 170 sage: -67387681.sqrt() % 625 # sign is flipped here too 541
Trivial cases (:trac:`3632`)::
sage: _multiply_point(E, R, P, 1) (0, 624, 1) sage: _multiply_point(E, R, 19*P, 1) (229, 455, 84) sage: (170 + 455) % 625 # note the sign did not flip here 0 sage: (541 + 84) % 625 0
Test over a range of `n` for a single curve with fairly random coefficients::
sage: R = Integers(625) sage: E = EllipticCurve([4, -11, 17, -8, -10]) sage: P = E.gens()[0] * LCM(E.tamagawa_numbers()) sage: from sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.padics import _multiply_point sage: Q = P sage: for n in range(1, 25): ....: naive = R(Q[0].numerator()), \ ....: R(Q[1].numerator()), \ ....: R(Q[0].denominator().sqrt()) ....: triple = _multiply_point(E, R, P, n) ....: assert (triple[0] == naive[0]) and ( \ ....: (triple[1] == naive[1] and triple[2] == naive[2]) or \ ....: (triple[1] == -naive[1] and triple[2] == -naive[2])), \ ....: "_multiply_point() gave an incorrect answer" ....: Q = Q + P """
# make a list of disjoint intervals [a[i], b[i]) such that we need to # compute g(k) for all a[i] <= k <= b[i] for each i min((interval[1] + 5) >> 1, interval[0])
# now walk through list and compute g(k) else:
else:
def padic_height(self, p, prec=20, sigma=None, check_hypotheses=True): r""" Compute the cyclotomic p-adic height.
The equation of the curve must be minimal at `p`.
INPUT:
- ``p`` - prime = 5 for which the curve has semi-stable reduction
- ``prec`` - integer = 1, desired precision of result
- ``sigma`` - precomputed value of sigma. If not supplied, this function will call padic_sigma to compute it.
- ``check_hypotheses`` - boolean, whether to check that this is a curve for which the p-adic height makes sense
OUTPUT: A function that accepts two parameters:
- a Q-rational point on the curve whose height should be computed
- optional boolean flag 'check': if False, it skips some input checking, and returns the p-adic height of that point to the desired precision.
- The normalization (sign and a factor 1/2 with respect to some other normalizations that appear in the literature) is chosen in such a way as to make the p-adic Birch Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture hold as stated in [Mazur-Tate-Teitelbaum].
AUTHORS:
- Jennifer Balakrishnan: original code developed at the 2006 MSRI graduate workshop on modular forms
- David Harvey (2006-09-13): integrated into Sage, optimised to speed up repeated evaluations of the returned height function, addressed some thorny precision questions
- David Harvey (2006-09-30): rewrote to use division polynomials for computing denominator of `nP`.
- David Harvey (2007-02): cleaned up according to algorithms in "Efficient Computation of p-adic Heights"
- Chris Wuthrich (2007-05): added supersingular and multiplicative heights
EXAMPLES::
sage: E = EllipticCurve("37a") sage: P = E.gens()[0] sage: h = E.padic_height(5, 10) sage: h(P) 5 + 5^2 + 5^3 + 3*5^6 + 4*5^7 + 5^9 + O(5^10)
An anomalous case::
sage: h = E.padic_height(53, 10) sage: h(P) 26*53^-1 + 30 + 20*53 + 47*53^2 + 10*53^3 + 32*53^4 + 9*53^5 + 22*53^6 + 35*53^7 + 30*53^8 + 17*53^9 + O(53^10)
Boundary case::
sage: E.padic_height(5, 3)(P) 5 + 5^2 + O(5^3)
A case that works the division polynomial code a little harder::
sage: E.padic_height(5, 10)(5*P) 5^3 + 5^4 + 5^5 + 3*5^8 + 4*5^9 + O(5^10)
Check that answers agree over a range of precisions::
sage: max_prec = 30 # make sure we get past p^2 # long time sage: full = E.padic_height(5, max_prec)(P) # long time sage: for prec in range(1, max_prec): # long time ....: assert E.padic_height(5, prec)(P) == full # long time
A supersingular prime for a curve::
sage: E = EllipticCurve('37a') sage: E.is_supersingular(3) True sage: h = E.padic_height(3, 5) sage: h(E.gens()[0]) (3 + 3^3 + O(3^6), 2*3^2 + 3^3 + 3^4 + 3^5 + 2*3^6 + O(3^7)) sage: E.padic_regulator(5) 5 + 5^2 + 5^3 + 3*5^6 + 4*5^7 + 5^9 + 5^10 + 3*5^11 + 3*5^12 + 5^13 + 4*5^14 + 5^15 + 2*5^16 + 5^17 + 2*5^18 + 4*5^19 + O(5^20) sage: E.padic_regulator(3, 5) (3 + 2*3^2 + 3^3 + O(3^4), 3^2 + 2*3^3 + 3^4 + O(3^5))
A torsion point in both the good and supersingular cases::
sage: E = EllipticCurve('11a') sage: P = E.torsion_subgroup().gen(0).element(); P (5 : 5 : 1) sage: h = E.padic_height(19, 5) sage: h(P) 0 sage: h = E.padic_height(5, 5) sage: h(P) 0
The result is not dependent on the model for the curve::
sage: E = EllipticCurve([0,0,0,0,2^12*17]) sage: Em = E.minimal_model() sage: P = E.gens()[0] sage: Pm = Em.gens()[0] sage: h = E.padic_height(7) sage: hm = Em.padic_height(7) sage: h(P) == hm(Pm) True
TESTS:
Check that ticket :trac:`20798` is solved::
sage: E = EllipticCurve("91b") sage: h = E.padic_height(7,10) sage: P = E.gen(0) sage: h(P) 2*7 + 7^2 + 5*7^3 + 6*7^4 + 2*7^5 + 3*7^6 + 7^7 + O(7^9) sage: h(P+P) 7 + 5*7^2 + 6*7^3 + 5*7^4 + 4*7^5 + 6*7^6 + 5*7^7 + O(7^9) """ raise ValueError("p = (%s) must be prime"%p) raise ValueError("p must be odd") # todo raise ArithmeticError("p must be a semi-stable prime")
raise ValueError("prec (=%s) must be at least 1" % prec)
# else good ordinary case
# For notation and definitions, see "Efficient Computation of # p-adic Heights", David Harvey (unpublished)
# K is the field for the final result
"from which the height function was created"
# changed sign to make it correct for p-adic bsd
"answer with precision at least prec, but we didn't."
# (man... I love python's local function definitions...)
def padic_height_via_multiply(self, p, prec=20, E2=None, check_hypotheses=True): r""" Computes the cyclotomic p-adic height.
The equation of the curve must be minimal at `p`.
INPUT:
- ``p`` - prime = 5 for which the curve has good ordinary reduction
- ``prec`` - integer = 2, desired precision of result
- ``E2`` - precomputed value of E2. If not supplied, this function will call padic_E2 to compute it. The value supplied must be correct mod `p^(prec-2)` (or slightly higher in the anomalous case; see the code for details).
- ``check_hypotheses`` - boolean, whether to check that this is a curve for which the p-adic height makes sense
OUTPUT: A function that accepts two parameters:
- a Q-rational point on the curve whose height should be computed
- optional boolean flag 'check': if False, it skips some input checking, and returns the p-adic height of that point to the desired precision.
- The normalization (sign and a factor 1/2 with respect to some other normalizations that appear in the literature) is chosen in such a way as to make the p-adic Birch Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture hold as stated in [Mazur-Tate-Teitelbaum].
AUTHORS:
- David Harvey (2008-01): based on the padic_height() function, using the algorithm of"Computing p-adic heights via point multiplication"
EXAMPLES::
sage: E = EllipticCurve("37a") sage: P = E.gens()[0] sage: h = E.padic_height_via_multiply(5, 10) sage: h(P) 5 + 5^2 + 5^3 + 3*5^6 + 4*5^7 + 5^9 + O(5^10)
An anomalous case::
sage: h = E.padic_height_via_multiply(53, 10) sage: h(P) 26*53^-1 + 30 + 20*53 + 47*53^2 + 10*53^3 + 32*53^4 + 9*53^5 + 22*53^6 + 35*53^7 + 30*53^8 + 17*53^9 + O(53^10)
Supply the value of E2 manually::
sage: E2 = E.padic_E2(5, 8) sage: E2 2 + 4*5 + 2*5^3 + 5^4 + 3*5^5 + 2*5^6 + O(5^8) sage: h = E.padic_height_via_multiply(5, 10, E2=E2) sage: h(P) 5 + 5^2 + 5^3 + 3*5^6 + 4*5^7 + 5^9 + O(5^10)
Boundary case::
sage: E.padic_height_via_multiply(5, 3)(P) 5 + 5^2 + O(5^3)
Check that answers agree over a range of precisions::
sage: max_prec = 30 # make sure we get past p^2 # long time sage: full = E.padic_height(5, max_prec)(P) # long time sage: for prec in range(2, max_prec): # long time ....: assert E.padic_height_via_multiply(5, prec)(P) == full # long time """ raise ValueError("p = (%s) must be prime"%p) raise ValueError("p must be odd") # todo raise ArithmeticError("must have good reduction at p") raise ArithmeticError("must be ordinary at p")
raise ValueError("prec (=%s) must be at least 1" % prec)
# For notation and definitions, see ``Computing p-adic heights via point # multiplication'' (David Harvey, still in draft form)
# K is the field for the final result
return K(0)
"from which the height function was created"
# changed sign to make it correct for p-adic bsd
"answer with precision at least prec, but we didn't."
# (man... I love python's local function definitions...)
def padic_sigma(self, p, N=20, E2=None, check=False, check_hypotheses=True): r""" Computes the p-adic sigma function with respect to the standard invariant differential `dx/(2y + a_1 x + a_3)`, as defined by Mazur and Tate, as a power series in the usual uniformiser `t` at the origin.
The equation of the curve must be minimal at `p`.
INPUT:
- ``p`` - prime = 5 for which the curve has good ordinary reduction
- ``N`` - integer = 1, indicates precision of result; see OUTPUT section for description
- ``E2`` - precomputed value of E2. If not supplied, this function will call padic_E2 to compute it. The value supplied must be correct mod `p^{N-2}`.
- ``check`` - boolean, whether to perform a consistency check (i.e. verify that the computed sigma satisfies the defining
- ``differential equation`` - note that this does NOT guarantee correctness of all the returned digits, but it comes pretty close :-))
- ``check_hypotheses`` - boolean, whether to check that this is a curve for which the p-adic sigma function makes sense
OUTPUT: A power series `t + \cdots` with coefficients in `\ZZ_p`.
The output series will be truncated at `O(t^{N+1})`, and the coefficient of `t^n` for `n \geq 1` will be correct to precision `O(p^{N-n+1})`.
In practice this means the following. If `t_0 = p^k u`, where `u` is a `p`-adic unit with at least `N` digits of precision, and `k \geq 1`, then the returned series may be used to compute `\sigma(t_0)` correctly modulo `p^{N+k}` (i.e. with `N` correct `p`-adic digits).
ALGORITHM: Described in "Efficient Computation of p-adic Heights" (David Harvey), which is basically an optimised version of the algorithm from "p-adic Heights and Log Convergence" (Mazur, Stein, Tate).
Running time is soft-`O(N^2 \log p)`, plus whatever time is necessary to compute `E_2`.
AUTHORS:
- David Harvey (2006-09-12)
- David Harvey (2007-02): rewrote
EXAMPLES::
sage: EllipticCurve([-1, 1/4]).padic_sigma(5, 10) O(5^11) + (1 + O(5^10))*t + O(5^9)*t^2 + (3 + 2*5^2 + 3*5^3 + 3*5^6 + 4*5^7 + O(5^8))*t^3 + O(5^7)*t^4 + (2 + 4*5^2 + 4*5^3 + 5^4 + 5^5 + O(5^6))*t^5 + O(5^5)*t^6 + (2 + 2*5 + 5^2 + 4*5^3 + O(5^4))*t^7 + O(5^3)*t^8 + (1 + 2*5 + O(5^2))*t^9 + O(5)*t^10 + O(t^11)
Run it with a consistency check::
sage: EllipticCurve("37a").padic_sigma(5, 10, check=True) O(5^11) + (1 + O(5^10))*t + O(5^9)*t^2 + (3 + 2*5^2 + 3*5^3 + 3*5^6 + 4*5^7 + O(5^8))*t^3 + (3 + 2*5 + 2*5^2 + 2*5^3 + 2*5^4 + 2*5^5 + 2*5^6 + O(5^7))*t^4 + (2 + 4*5^2 + 4*5^3 + 5^4 + 5^5 + O(5^6))*t^5 + (2 + 3*5 + 5^4 + O(5^5))*t^6 + (4 + 3*5 + 2*5^2 + O(5^4))*t^7 + (2 + 3*5 + 2*5^2 + O(5^3))*t^8 + (4*5 + O(5^2))*t^9 + (1 + O(5))*t^10 + O(t^11)
Boundary cases::
sage: EllipticCurve([1, 1, 1, 1, 1]).padic_sigma(5, 1) (1 + O(5))*t + O(t^2) sage: EllipticCurve([1, 1, 1, 1, 1]).padic_sigma(5, 2) (1 + O(5^2))*t + (3 + O(5))*t^2 + O(t^3)
Supply your very own value of E2::
sage: X = EllipticCurve("37a") sage: my_E2 = X.padic_E2(5, 8) sage: my_E2 = my_E2 + 5**5 # oops!!! sage: X.padic_sigma(5, 10, E2=my_E2) O(5^11) + (1 + O(5^10))*t + O(5^9)*t^2 + (3 + 2*5^2 + 3*5^3 + 4*5^5 + 2*5^6 + 3*5^7 + O(5^8))*t^3 + (3 + 2*5 + 2*5^2 + 2*5^3 + 2*5^4 + 2*5^5 + 2*5^6 + O(5^7))*t^4 + (2 + 4*5^2 + 4*5^3 + 5^4 + 3*5^5 + O(5^6))*t^5 + (2 + 3*5 + 5^4 + O(5^5))*t^6 + (4 + 3*5 + 2*5^2 + O(5^4))*t^7 + (2 + 3*5 + 2*5^2 + O(5^3))*t^8 + (4*5 + O(5^2))*t^9 + (1 + O(5))*t^10 + O(t^11)
Check that sigma is "weight 1".
::
sage: f = EllipticCurve([-1, 3]).padic_sigma(5, 10) sage: g = EllipticCurve([-1*(2**4), 3*(2**6)]).padic_sigma(5, 10) sage: t = f.parent().gen() sage: f(2*t)/2 (1 + O(5^10))*t + (4 + 3*5 + 3*5^2 + 3*5^3 + 4*5^4 + 4*5^5 + 3*5^6 + 5^7 + O(5^8))*t^3 + (3 + 3*5^2 + 5^4 + 2*5^5 + O(5^6))*t^5 + (4 + 5 + 3*5^3 + O(5^4))*t^7 + (4 + 2*5 + O(5^2))*t^9 + O(5)*t^10 + O(t^11) sage: g O(5^11) + (1 + O(5^10))*t + O(5^9)*t^2 + (4 + 3*5 + 3*5^2 + 3*5^3 + 4*5^4 + 4*5^5 + 3*5^6 + 5^7 + O(5^8))*t^3 + O(5^7)*t^4 + (3 + 3*5^2 + 5^4 + 2*5^5 + O(5^6))*t^5 + O(5^5)*t^6 + (4 + 5 + 3*5^3 + O(5^4))*t^7 + O(5^3)*t^8 + (4 + 2*5 + O(5^2))*t^9 + O(5)*t^10 + O(t^11) sage: f(2*t)/2 -g O(t^11)
Test that it returns consistent results over a range of precision::
sage: max_N = 30 # get up to at least p^2 # long time sage: E = EllipticCurve([1, 1, 1, 1, 1]) # long time sage: p = 5 # long time sage: E2 = E.padic_E2(5, max_N) # long time sage: max_sigma = E.padic_sigma(p, max_N, E2=E2) # long time sage: for N in range(3, max_N): # long time ....: sigma = E.padic_sigma(p, N, E2=E2) # long time ....: assert sigma == max_sigma """
# todo: implement the p == 3 case # NOTE: If we ever implement p == 3, it's necessary to check over # the precision loss estimates (below) very carefully; I think it # may become necessary to compute E2 to an even higher precision. raise NotImplementedError("p (=%s) must be at least 5" % p)
# a few special cases for small N raise ValueError("N (=%s) must be at least 1" % prec)
# return simply t + O(t^2)
# return t + a_1/2 t^2 + O(t^3) K(self.a1()/2, 1)], prec=3)
raise NotImplementedError("equation of curve must be minimal at p")
raise ValueError("supplied E2 has insufficient precision")
# do integral over QQ, to avoid divisions by p
# Convert to a power series and remove the -1/x term. # Also we artificially bump up the accuracy from N-2 to N-1 digits; # the constant term needs to be known to N-1 digits, so we compute # it directly
# Convert the answer to power series over p-adics; drop the precision # of the $t^k$ coefficient to $p^(N-k+1)$. # [Note: there are actually more digits available, but it's a bit # tricky to figure out exactly how many, and we only need $p^(N-k+1)$ # for p-adic height purposes anyway]
# if requested, check that sigma satisfies the appropriate # differential equation
# convert sigma to be over Z/p^N
# apply differential equation
# coefficient of t^k in the result should be zero mod p^(N-k-2) "sigma correctness check failed!"
def padic_sigma_truncated(self, p, N=20, lamb=0, E2=None, check_hypotheses=True): r""" Computes the p-adic sigma function with respect to the standard invariant differential `dx/(2y + a_1 x + a_3)`, as defined by Mazur and Tate, as a power series in the usual uniformiser `t` at the origin.
The equation of the curve must be minimal at `p`.
This function differs from padic_sigma() in the precision profile of the returned power series; see OUTPUT below.
INPUT:
- ``p`` - prime = 5 for which the curve has good ordinary reduction
- ``N`` - integer = 2, indicates precision of result; see OUTPUT section for description
- ``lamb`` - integer = 0, see OUTPUT section for description
- ``E2`` - precomputed value of E2. If not supplied, this function will call padic_E2 to compute it. The value supplied must be correct mod `p^{N-2}`.
- ``check_hypotheses`` - boolean, whether to check that this is a curve for which the p-adic sigma function makes sense
OUTPUT: A power series `t + \cdots` with coefficients in `\ZZ_p`.
The coefficient of `t^j` for `j \geq 1` will be correct to precision `O(p^{N - 2 + (3 - j)(lamb + 1)})`.
ALGORITHM: Described in "Efficient Computation of p-adic Heights" (David Harvey, to appear in LMS JCM), which is basically an optimised version of the algorithm from "p-adic Heights and Log Convergence" (Mazur, Stein, Tate), and "Computing p-adic heights via point multiplication" (David Harvey, still draft form).
Running time is soft-`O(N^2 \lambda^{-1} \log p)`, plus whatever time is necessary to compute `E_2`.
AUTHOR:
- David Harvey (2008-01): wrote based on previous padic_sigma function
EXAMPLES::
sage: E = EllipticCurve([-1, 1/4]) sage: E.padic_sigma_truncated(5, 10) O(5^11) + (1 + O(5^10))*t + O(5^9)*t^2 + (3 + 2*5^2 + 3*5^3 + 3*5^6 + 4*5^7 + O(5^8))*t^3 + O(5^7)*t^4 + (2 + 4*5^2 + 4*5^3 + 5^4 + 5^5 + O(5^6))*t^5 + O(5^5)*t^6 + (2 + 2*5 + 5^2 + 4*5^3 + O(5^4))*t^7 + O(5^3)*t^8 + (1 + 2*5 + O(5^2))*t^9 + O(5)*t^10 + O(t^11)
Note the precision of the `t^3` coefficient depends only on `N`, not on lamb::
sage: E.padic_sigma_truncated(5, 10, lamb=2) O(5^17) + (1 + O(5^14))*t + O(5^11)*t^2 + (3 + 2*5^2 + 3*5^3 + 3*5^6 + 4*5^7 + O(5^8))*t^3 + O(5^5)*t^4 + (2 + O(5^2))*t^5 + O(t^6)
Compare against plain padic_sigma() function over a dense range of N and lamb
::
sage: E = EllipticCurve([1, 2, 3, 4, 7]) # long time sage: E2 = E.padic_E2(5, 50) # long time sage: for N in range(2, 10): # long time ....: for lamb in range(10): # long time ....: correct = E.padic_sigma(5, N + 3*lamb, E2=E2) # long time ....: compare = E.padic_sigma_truncated(5, N=N, lamb=lamb, E2=E2) # long time ....: assert compare == correct # long time """
# todo: implement the p == 3 case # NOTE: If we ever implement p == 3, it's necessary to check over # the precision loss estimates (below) very carefully; I think it # may become necessary to compute E2 to an even higher precision. raise NotImplementedError("p (=%s) must be at least 5" % p)
raise ValueError("lamb (=%s) must be at least 0" % lamb)
# a few special cases for small N raise ValueError("N (=%s) must be at least 2" % N)
# return t + a_1/2 t^2 + O(t^3) K = Qp(p, 3*(lamb+1)) return PowerSeriesRing(K, "t")([K(0), K(1, 2*(lamb+1)), K(self.a1()/2, lamb+1)], prec=3)
raise NotImplementedError("equation of curve must be minimal at p")
raise ValueError("supplied E2 has insufficient precision")
# The main part of the algorithm is exactly the same as # for padic_sigma(), but we truncate all the series earlier. # Want the answer O(t^(trunc+1)) instead of O(t^(N+1)) like in padic_sigma().
# do integral over QQ, to avoid divisions by p
# Convert to a power series and remove the -1/x term. # Also we artificially bump up the accuracy from N-2 to N-1+lamb digits; # the constant term needs to be known to N-1+lamb digits, so we compute # it directly
# Convert the answer to power series over p-adics; drop the precision # of the $t^j$ coefficient to $p^{N - 2 + (3 - j)(lamb + 1)})$.
def padic_E2(self, p, prec=20, check=False, check_hypotheses=True, algorithm="auto"): r""" Returns the value of the `p`-adic modular form `E2` for `(E, \omega)` where `\omega` is the usual invariant differential `dx/(2y + a_1 x + a_3)`.
INPUT:
- ``p`` - prime (= 5) for which `E` is good and ordinary
- ``prec`` - (relative) p-adic precision (= 1) for result
- ``check`` - boolean, whether to perform a consistency check. This will slow down the computation by a constant factor 2. (The consistency check is to compute the whole matrix of frobenius on Monsky-Washnitzer cohomology, and verify that its trace is correct to the specified precision. Otherwise, the trace is used to compute one column from the other one (possibly after a change of basis).)
- ``check_hypotheses`` - boolean, whether to check that this is a curve for which the p-adic sigma function makes sense
- ``algorithm`` - one of "standard", "sqrtp", or "auto". This selects which version of Kedlaya's algorithm is used. The "standard" one is the one described in Kedlaya's paper. The "sqrtp" one has better performance for large `p`, but only works when `p > 6N` (`N=` prec). The "auto" option selects "sqrtp" whenever possible.
Note that if the "sqrtp" algorithm is used, a consistency check will automatically be applied, regardless of the setting of the "check" flag.
OUTPUT: p-adic number to precision prec
.. note::
If the discriminant of the curve has nonzero valuation at p, then the result will not be returned mod `p^\text{prec}`, but it still *will* have prec *digits* of precision.
.. TODO::
Once we have a better implementation of the "standard" algorithm, the algorithm selection strategy for "auto" needs to be revisited.
AUTHORS:
- David Harvey (2006-09-01): partly based on code written by Robert Bradshaw at the MSRI 2006 modular forms workshop
ACKNOWLEDGMENT: - discussion with Eyal Goren that led to the trace trick.
EXAMPLES: Here is the example discussed in the paper "Computation of p-adic Heights and Log Convergence" (Mazur, Stein, Tate)::
sage: EllipticCurve([-1, 1/4]).padic_E2(5) 2 + 4*5 + 2*5^3 + 5^4 + 3*5^5 + 2*5^6 + 5^8 + 3*5^9 + 4*5^10 + 2*5^11 + 2*5^12 + 2*5^14 + 3*5^15 + 3*5^16 + 3*5^17 + 4*5^18 + 2*5^19 + O(5^20)
Let's try to higher precision (this is the same answer the MAGMA implementation gives)::
sage: EllipticCurve([-1, 1/4]).padic_E2(5, 100) 2 + 4*5 + 2*5^3 + 5^4 + 3*5^5 + 2*5^6 + 5^8 + 3*5^9 + 4*5^10 + 2*5^11 + 2*5^12 + 2*5^14 + 3*5^15 + 3*5^16 + 3*5^17 + 4*5^18 + 2*5^19 + 4*5^20 + 5^21 + 4*5^22 + 2*5^23 + 3*5^24 + 3*5^26 + 2*5^27 + 3*5^28 + 2*5^30 + 5^31 + 4*5^33 + 3*5^34 + 4*5^35 + 5^36 + 4*5^37 + 4*5^38 + 3*5^39 + 4*5^41 + 2*5^42 + 3*5^43 + 2*5^44 + 2*5^48 + 3*5^49 + 4*5^50 + 2*5^51 + 5^52 + 4*5^53 + 4*5^54 + 3*5^55 + 2*5^56 + 3*5^57 + 4*5^58 + 4*5^59 + 5^60 + 3*5^61 + 5^62 + 4*5^63 + 5^65 + 3*5^66 + 2*5^67 + 5^69 + 2*5^70 + 3*5^71 + 3*5^72 + 5^74 + 5^75 + 5^76 + 3*5^77 + 4*5^78 + 4*5^79 + 2*5^80 + 3*5^81 + 5^82 + 5^83 + 4*5^84 + 3*5^85 + 2*5^86 + 3*5^87 + 5^88 + 2*5^89 + 4*5^90 + 4*5^92 + 3*5^93 + 4*5^94 + 3*5^95 + 2*5^96 + 4*5^97 + 4*5^98 + 2*5^99 + O(5^100)
Check it works at low precision too::
sage: EllipticCurve([-1, 1/4]).padic_E2(5, 1) 2 + O(5) sage: EllipticCurve([-1, 1/4]).padic_E2(5, 2) 2 + 4*5 + O(5^2) sage: EllipticCurve([-1, 1/4]).padic_E2(5, 3) 2 + 4*5 + O(5^3)
TODO: With the old(-er), i.e., = sage-2.4 p-adics we got `5 + O(5^2)` as output, i.e., relative precision 1, but with the newer p-adics we get relative precision 0 and absolute precision 1.
::
sage: EllipticCurve([1, 1, 1, 1, 1]).padic_E2(5, 1) O(5)
Check it works for different models of the same curve (37a), even when the discriminant changes by a power of p (note that E2 depends on the differential too, which is why it gets scaled in some of the examples below)::
sage: X1 = EllipticCurve([-1, 1/4]) sage: X1.j_invariant(), X1.discriminant() (110592/37, 37) sage: X1.padic_E2(5, 10) 2 + 4*5 + 2*5^3 + 5^4 + 3*5^5 + 2*5^6 + 5^8 + 3*5^9 + O(5^10)
::
sage: X2 = EllipticCurve([0, 0, 1, -1, 0]) sage: X2.j_invariant(), X2.discriminant() (110592/37, 37) sage: X2.padic_E2(5, 10) 2 + 4*5 + 2*5^3 + 5^4 + 3*5^5 + 2*5^6 + 5^8 + 3*5^9 + O(5^10)
::
sage: X3 = EllipticCurve([-1*(2**4), 1/4*(2**6)]) sage: X3.j_invariant(), X3.discriminant() / 2**12 (110592/37, 37) sage: 2**(-2) * X3.padic_E2(5, 10) 2 + 4*5 + 2*5^3 + 5^4 + 3*5^5 + 2*5^6 + 5^8 + 3*5^9 + O(5^10)
::
sage: X4 = EllipticCurve([-1*(7**4), 1/4*(7**6)]) sage: X4.j_invariant(), X4.discriminant() / 7**12 (110592/37, 37) sage: 7**(-2) * X4.padic_E2(5, 10) 2 + 4*5 + 2*5^3 + 5^4 + 3*5^5 + 2*5^6 + 5^8 + 3*5^9 + O(5^10)
::
sage: X5 = EllipticCurve([-1*(5**4), 1/4*(5**6)]) sage: X5.j_invariant(), X5.discriminant() / 5**12 (110592/37, 37) sage: 5**(-2) * X5.padic_E2(5, 10) 2 + 4*5 + 2*5^3 + 5^4 + 3*5^5 + 2*5^6 + 5^8 + 3*5^9 + O(5^10)
::
sage: X6 = EllipticCurve([-1/(5**4), 1/4/(5**6)]) sage: X6.j_invariant(), X6.discriminant() * 5**12 (110592/37, 37) sage: 5**2 * X6.padic_E2(5, 10) 2 + 4*5 + 2*5^3 + 5^4 + 3*5^5 + 2*5^6 + 5^8 + 3*5^9 + O(5^10)
Test check=True vs check=False::
sage: EllipticCurve([-1, 1/4]).padic_E2(5, 1, check=False) 2 + O(5) sage: EllipticCurve([-1, 1/4]).padic_E2(5, 1, check=True) 2 + O(5) sage: EllipticCurve([-1, 1/4]).padic_E2(5, 30, check=False) 2 + 4*5 + 2*5^3 + 5^4 + 3*5^5 + 2*5^6 + 5^8 + 3*5^9 + 4*5^10 + 2*5^11 + 2*5^12 + 2*5^14 + 3*5^15 + 3*5^16 + 3*5^17 + 4*5^18 + 2*5^19 + 4*5^20 + 5^21 + 4*5^22 + 2*5^23 + 3*5^24 + 3*5^26 + 2*5^27 + 3*5^28 + O(5^30) sage: EllipticCurve([-1, 1/4]).padic_E2(5, 30, check=True) 2 + 4*5 + 2*5^3 + 5^4 + 3*5^5 + 2*5^6 + 5^8 + 3*5^9 + 4*5^10 + 2*5^11 + 2*5^12 + 2*5^14 + 3*5^15 + 3*5^16 + 3*5^17 + 4*5^18 + 2*5^19 + 4*5^20 + 5^21 + 4*5^22 + 2*5^23 + 3*5^24 + 3*5^26 + 2*5^27 + 3*5^28 + O(5^30)
Here's one using the `p^{1/2}` algorithm::
sage: EllipticCurve([-1, 1/4]).padic_E2(3001, 3, algorithm="sqrtp") 1907 + 2819*3001 + 1124*3001^2 + O(3001^3) """ if not self.conductor() % (p**2) == 0: eq = self.tate_curve(p) return eq.E2(prec=prec)
# todo: think about the sign of this. Is it correct?
+ O(p**prec)
# Take into account the coordinate change. # todo: here I should be able to write: # return E2_of_X / fudge_factor # However, there is a bug in Sage (#51 on trac) which makes this # crash sometimes when prec == 1. For example, # EllipticCurve([1, 1, 1, 1, 1]).padic_E2(5, 1) # makes it crash. I haven't figured out exactly what the bug # is yet, but for now I use the following workaround:
def matrix_of_frobenius(self, p, prec=20, check=False, check_hypotheses=True, algorithm="auto"): r""" Returns the matrix of Frobenius on the Monsky Washnitzer cohomology of the elliptic curve.
INPUT:
- ``p`` - prime (>= 3) for which `E` is good and ordinary
- ``prec`` - (relative) `p`-adic precision for result (default 20)
- ``check`` - boolean (default: False), whether to perform a consistency check. This will slow down the computation by a constant factor 2. (The consistency check is to verify that its trace is correct to the specified precision. Otherwise, the trace is used to compute one column from the other one (possibly after a change of basis).)
- ``check_hypotheses`` - boolean, whether to check that this is a curve for which the `p`-adic sigma function makes sense
- ``algorithm`` - one of "standard", "sqrtp", or "auto". This selects which version of Kedlaya's algorithm is used. The "standard" one is the one described in Kedlaya's paper. The "sqrtp" one has better performance for large `p`, but only works when `p > 6N` (`N=` prec). The "auto" option selects "sqrtp" whenever possible.
Note that if the "sqrtp" algorithm is used, a consistency check will automatically be applied, regardless of the setting of the "check" flag.
OUTPUT: a matrix of `p`-adic number to precision ``prec``
See also the documentation of padic_E2.
EXAMPLES::
sage: E = EllipticCurve('37a1') sage: E.matrix_of_frobenius(7) [ 2*7 + 4*7^2 + 5*7^4 + 6*7^5 + 6*7^6 + 7^8 + 4*7^9 + 3*7^10 + 2*7^11 + 5*7^12 + 4*7^14 + 7^16 + 2*7^17 + 3*7^18 + 4*7^19 + 3*7^20 + O(7^21) 2 + 3*7 + 6*7^2 + 7^3 + 3*7^4 + 5*7^5 + 3*7^7 + 7^8 + 3*7^9 + 6*7^13 + 7^14 + 7^16 + 5*7^17 + 4*7^18 + 7^19 + O(7^20)] [ 2*7 + 3*7^2 + 7^3 + 3*7^4 + 6*7^5 + 2*7^6 + 3*7^7 + 5*7^8 + 3*7^9 + 2*7^11 + 6*7^12 + 5*7^13 + 4*7^16 + 4*7^17 + 6*7^18 + 6*7^19 + 4*7^20 + O(7^21) 6 + 4*7 + 2*7^2 + 6*7^3 + 7^4 + 6*7^7 + 5*7^8 + 2*7^9 + 3*7^10 + 4*7^11 + 7^12 + 6*7^13 + 2*7^14 + 6*7^15 + 5*7^16 + 4*7^17 + 3*7^18 + 2*7^19 + O(7^20)] sage: M = E.matrix_of_frobenius(11,prec=3); M [ 9*11 + 9*11^3 + O(11^4) 10 + 11 + O(11^3)] [ 2*11 + 11^2 + O(11^4) 6 + 11 + 10*11^2 + O(11^3)] sage: M.det() 11 + O(11^4) sage: M.trace() 6 + 10*11 + 10*11^2 + O(11^3) sage: E.ap(11) -5 sage: E = EllipticCurve('83a1') sage: E.matrix_of_frobenius(3,6) [ 2*3 + 3^5 + O(3^6) 2*3 + 2*3^2 + 2*3^3 + O(3^6)] [ 2*3 + 3^2 + 2*3^5 + O(3^6) 2 + 2*3^2 + 2*3^3 + 2*3^4 + 3^5 + O(3^6)]
""" # TODO change the basis back to the original equation. # TODO, add lots of comments like the above
raise ValueError("sqrtp algorithm is only available when p > 6*prec")
raise ValueError("unknown algorithm '%s'" % algorithm)
# todo: maybe it would be good if default prec was None, and then # it selects an appropriate precision based on how large the prime # is
# for p = 3, we create the corresponding hyperelliptic curve # and call matrix of frobenius on it
raise NotImplementedError("p (=%s) must be at least 3" % p)
raise ValueError("prec (=%s) must be at least 1" % prec)
# To run matrix_of_frobenius(), we need to have the equation in the # form y^2 = x^3 + ax + b, whose discriminant is invertible mod p. # When we change coordinates like this, we might scale the invariant # differential, so we need to account for this. We do this by # comparing discriminants: if the discriminants differ by u^12, # then the differentials differ by u. There's a sign ambiguity here, # but it doesn't matter because E2 changes by u^2 :-)
# todo: In fact, there should be available a function that returns # exactly *which* coordinate change was used. If I had that I could # avoid the discriminant circus at the end.
# todo: The following strategy won't work at all for p = 2, 3.
"The discriminant of the Weierstrass model should be a unit " \ " at p."
# Need to increase precision a little to compensate for precision # losses during the computation. (See monsky_washnitzer.py # for more details.)
else:
Q, p, adjusted_prec, trace)
else: # algorithm == "sqrtp"
# let's force a trace-check since this algorithm is fairly new # and we don't want to get caught with our pants down...
# return frob_p ## why was this here ?
"Consistency check failed! (correct = %s, actual = %s)" % \ (correct_trace, trace_of_frobenius)
def _brent(F, p, N): r""" This is an internal function; it is used by padic_sigma().
`F` is a assumed to be a power series over `R = \ZZ/p^{N-1}\ZZ`.
It solves the differential equation `G'(t)/G(t) = F(t)` using Brent's algorithm, with initial condition `G(0) = 1`. It is assumed that the solution `G` has `p`-integral coefficients.
More precisely, suppose that `f(t)` is a power series with genuine `p`-adic coefficients, and suppose that `g(t)` is an exact solution to `g'(t)/g(t) = f(t)`. Let `I` be the ideal `(p^N, p^{N-1} t, \ldots, p t^{N-1}, t^N)`. The input `F(t)` should be a finite-precision approximation to `f(t)`, in the sense that `\int (F - f) dt` should lie in `I`. Then the function returns a series `G(t)` such that `(G - g)(t)` lies in `I`.
Complexity should be about `O(N^2 \log^2 N \log p)`, plus some log-log factors.
For more information, and a proof of the precision guarantees, see Lemma 4 in "Efficient Computation of p-adic Heights" (David Harvey).
AUTHORS:
- David Harvey (2007-02)
EXAMPLES: Carefully test the precision guarantees::
sage: brent = sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.padics._brent sage: for p in [2, 3, 5]: ....: for N in [2, 3, 10, 50]: ....: R = Integers(p**(N-1)) ....: Rx.<x> = PowerSeriesRing(R, "x") ....: for _ in range(5): ....: g = [R.random_element() for i in range(N)] ....: g[0] = R(1) ....: g = Rx(g, len(g)) ....: f = g.derivative() / g ....: # perturb f by something whose integral is in I ....: err = [R.random_element() * p**(N-i) for i in range(N+1)] ....: err = Rx(err, len(err)) ....: err = err.derivative() ....: F = f + err ....: # run brent() and compare output modulo I ....: G = brent(F, p, N) ....: assert G.prec() >= N, "not enough output terms" ....: err = (G - g).list() ....: for i in range(len(err)): ....: assert err[i].lift().valuation(p) >= (N - i), \ ....: "incorrect precision output" """
# initial approximation:
# loop over an appropriate increasing sequence of lengths s # zero-extend to s terms # todo: there has to be a better way in Sage to do this...
# extend current approximation to be correct to s terms # Do the integral of H over QQ[x] to avoid division by p problems
|